
How we check sources
A clear route from a statement to the information behind it.
Start with a traceable source.
A game profile should make it possible to follow a factual statement back to its source. Provider materials can establish what a developer publishes about a title. They cannot, on their own, verify an operator’s conduct or a reader’s individual experience.
Keep different claims separate
We distinguish published product information, supplied artwork and editorial interpretation. An illustration is not evidence of a game feature. A promotional statement is not an independent result. If a detail has not been verified, we leave it unconfirmed.
Check the title and version
Similarly named titles can be separate releases. When using a source, check the exact product name and whether the statement applies to the edition being discussed. Dynamic information should be checked again before it is relied upon.
Make corrections visible
If you find an inaccurate statement or a missing source, send the article URL and an explanation through our correction form. Reports are stored for editorial review. Material corrections should explain what changed rather than silently replacing the original claim.
What we checked for the current profiles
For each game profile we link the JILI product page for that exact title and use only the feature names and descriptions shown there. In November 2026 these pages were compared with our profiles:
- Super Ace (PlusIntro 49)
- Fortune Gems (PlusIntro 109)
- Golden Empire (PlusIntro 103)
- Boxing King (PlusIntro 77)
- Blackjack (PlusIntro 219)
- Keno Extra Bet (PlusIntro 274)
- Mega Fishing (PlusIntro 74)
Where a provider page labels the same detail in two different ways, or a number cannot be tied to a specific edition, we leave it out rather than choose one. One example is a paylines field that disagrees with the description text.
What these checks cannot establish
A provider page does not tell us the RTP an operator configures, the software version a website serves, or the rules shown on a particular table. None of our profiles reports hands-on testing unless a page says so and identifies the observation, as the Super Ace profile does for one contributor record.

Discussion